Main page EN - ES - GR

It is reasonable for anyone who has nothing to hide to support the abolition of cash.

Tax evasion and black money will be significantly reduced via the abolition of cash. Unfair competition generated by them, bureaucracy and its cost will be reduced as well.
The mandatory use of cards raises questions of data breach .
The banks charge significant fees for electronic transactions.
The elimination of cash will give to governments absolute power.
With the abolition of cash, citizens will be at the mercy of negative interest rates.
The abolition of cash will hit small-scale tax evasion which is a matter of survival for some people.
Bank deposits are subjected to haircuts.
Illegal activities will find another transaction way e.g. gold or foreign currencies.
The same effect against black money can be achieved by simplier methods i.e.via a policy of assets registration.
The confidentiality of transactions is protected by law and it is lifted only in cases where there is suspicion of illegal activity.
Privacy is dead long ago with the advent of mobile phones, the monitoring cameras etc.
The benefits for the taxpayer from the reduction of tax evasion are expect to be more important than the cost of electronic transactions fees.
The power of governments on the property of citizens is already absolute even with the existence of cash. The difference lies only on the effective control that will lead to a fair implementation of decisions on everyone.
Cash has no fixed value and it can be considered as an investment since it is a form of currency and this means that it can significantly lose its value. The consumer is always free to choose another type of investment.
There are thousands of people, salaried and retired ones, who are barely surviving and do not have the opportunity to hide their income.
Cash outside banks is subjected to robberies. Anyway, the depositor may choose a bank that he trusts.
Although the abolition of cash will not eliminate the black money , it is certain that it will greatly reduce it, so it is worth it.
A policy of assets registration by itself is not enough because it depends on the sincere declaration of each one.